Archive for the 'productivity' category

ok cupid’s wisdom for writers

I just read this post by Georgina Bruce, an up-and-coming writer I admire, and it made me think of this research done by the online dating service OK Cupid on “The Mathematics of Beauty.”

Bruce said this about an experience she had with a bad review of her writing:

I once read a review about one of my stories that was so scathing, so unkind, that it stopped me writing for months. It made me frightened to write anything else, scared that more scorn and bile would be poured over my creations, terrified that this person might be right. In retrospect, it’s easy to see that this critic had some kind of personal axe to grind, but at the time, I was deeply affected.

I had a similar experience, in a fiction writing workshop waaaaay back when I was an undergraduate, which was very damaging and hurtful. It stopped me in my tracks for a long time. (It is probably not a coincidence that I switched genres to poetry and have only switched back to fiction in the past five or so years.)

Typically, we get advice from other writers that haters gonna hate, and to pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, etc., etc., but that’s hard to do in practice.

Enter OK Cupid and their research on beauty, hotness, and number of times you get asked out. Their findings indicate:

  • that the more men as a group disagree about a woman’s looks, the more they end up liking her
  • guys tend to ignore girls who are merely cute
  • and, in fact, having some men think she’s ugly actually works in a woman’s favor

I highly recommend reading the article, because how they reached those conclusions is fascinating, but let’s assume for the moment that this is an accurate assessment of reality.

Now for the magic: let’s replace a few key words, shall we?

  • The more critics as a group disagree about a writer’s ability, the more they end up liking her work
  • critics tend to ignore writers who are merely competent
  • and, in fact, having some critics think she’s a terrible writer actually works in a writer’s favor

This kind of boils down to the homegrown wisdom that if you aren’t pissing off a few people, you probably aren’t doing your job as a writer. This may be especially true in speculative fiction, where so many people arrive with so many different expectations of the genre.

What do you think?

 

One response so far

io9 explains the 10 Types of Writers’ Block

Oct 07 2011 Published by under motivation, productivity

If you’re heading into the weekend feeling stuck but hoping for some productive writing time, here are some thoughts from SF blog io9 about The 10 Types of Writers’ Block and How to Overcome Them.

For me, number 1 (“You can’t come up with an idea“) has never been a problem, but I sometimes struggle with number 9 (“You had this incredibly cool story in your head, and now you’re turning it into words on a screen and it’s suddenly dumb”).

The post is illustrated with pulp SF magazine covers from Astounding and Amazing Stories, so what’s not to love?

Comments are off for this post

getting into the flow state 101

I’m reading Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (the back cover advises that’s pronounced “chick-SENT-me-high”) and am so far (about halfway through) finding it really useful.

The flow state is all about being highly focused and engaged in an activity, and though a few people never achieve that state, most do, at least from time to time.

He uses the example of skiing down a mountainside on a tough run, in which any loss of focus on that immediate task at hand will result in a faceplant. You aren’t thinking about your tax returns in that moment; you are fully engaged. And even though people aren’t necessarily happy or unhappy while they are in the flow state, they are likely to be happier afterward, recalling that state.

Turns out there are some keys to getting into this flow state. You are more likely to experience “flow” with tasks that

  • have clear goals
  • provide relevant feedback
  • offer challenges in balance with your skills (ideally matching high-level challenges to high-level skills)

Those three things together tend to give you opportunities for complete focus.

If I’m reading Csikszentmihalyi right, you can also sort of prime the pump by engaging in short, flow-inducing activities throughout the day to help you reset, refresh, and re-engage. Here’s an example: Teoria.com offers this ear-training musical intervals tutorial. I’ve been visiting it at least once a day to give myself a break and change of pace, and it does help me recharge my mental batteries, because it’s so different from the work I’m doing on the job.

It also meets the three criteria: clear goals (name the correct intervals when you hear them), relevant feedback (it tells you as you go whether you’ve gotten the correct answer), and challenges in balance with my skills (a music major would probably need to find a more difficult task, and someone with no musical training would need something more basic).

Very helpful. Now on to the next challenge: figuring out how to get into the flow state more in my writing. The challenges I see there are 1) setting the right goals and 2) bringing in the right feedback quickly enough. Both are tricky.

Setting the right goals requires careful consideration of what you’re trying to accomplish and what is likely to encourage you. Target word counts per day aren’t usually good goals for me, because they quickly turn something I love to do into drudgery, but oddly, setting a goal of writing a scene a day feels different to me. What works best so far is setting ridiculously easy daily goals that help me keep my momentum going: writing for 15 minutes, say, or just opening the Word file of the current project and looking at it.

Relevant feedback is even more tricky, because to get relevant feedback as you’re writing, you can’t rely on external sources (workshops, other readers). I think instead you have to develop a special quality of attention.

It’s the same quality of attention that William Stafford was talking about in “Interviewing Tracker Dog: a fantasy before the daily craft lecture at any writers’ conference” (from Crossing Unmarked Snow: Further Views on the Writer’s Vocation – HIGHLY recommended). If you can find a recording of him reading it, even better; he embodies the process of seeking and paying attention that writers do in a simple, brilliant, and poignant way.

Comments are off for this post

Na No Revise Mo

Nov 01 2010 Published by under editing and revising, productivity

Some friends and acquaintances have asked me whether I plan to do NaNoWriMo this month, and I responded with horror, “Then I’ll have TWO novels in the revision process.” That way lies madness (for me, for now, anyway). So I’m declaring November my personal National Novel Revising Month instead. Continue Reading »

Comments are off for this post

wisdom of the controlled burn

I’m back at work today and there to greet me is a shiny new operating system on my work computer. In some ways it’s a lost day, since I have to install and configure a bunch of widgets, get all my devices talking to one another again, et cetera, et cetera.

On the plus side, getting a new operating system has also forced me to degunkify my desktop, which also serves to clear my head via a process of sympathetic magic. Being gone for seven workdays (eleven calendar days!)* has also helped with the head-clearing. And now I get to learn some new computery stuff about the operating system and new versions of various software tools I use for work (Windows 7 and Adobe CS5). Continue Reading »

Comments are off for this post

Older posts »